Legislation

Judge Declines to Extend Substantial Equivalence Deadline to Cigar Industry

Oct 21, 2019 | By Andrew Nagy
Judge Declines to Extend Substantial Equivalence Deadline to Cigar Industry

A judge in Washington D.C. has denied the cigar industry’s request to extend the deadline for a key product approval rule known as Substantial Equivalence.

Substantial Equivalence is one of the three pathways to product approval that the FDA established when it published its Final Deeming Rule in May 2016. According to the FDA, a cigar manufacturer must file an SE report to show that a new tobacco product has similar characteristics to a grandfathered (predicate) tobacco product, or has different characteristics, but doesn't raise any new questions of public health. A predicate tobacco product is one that was on the market on February 15, 2007.

Judge Amit P. Mehta of United States District Court for the District of Columbia filed his ruling on Friday, saying that the cigar industry failed to establish that the new Substantial Equivalence deadline is unfair to cigar manufacturers. The motion was filed in July on behalf of the Cigar Rights of America, Cigar Association of America and Premium Cigar Association.

“That is because the predicament in which Plaintiffs find themselves—facing an earlier deadline to comply with a new statutory substantial equivalence requirement—was caused not by any action or inaction by the Food and Drug Administration; rather, it is entirely a function of a judicial ruling,” wrote Judge Mehta in his ruling.

Earlier this year, the Substantial Equivalence deadline was moved up to May 2020 by a judge’s ruling in a Maryland court case called American Academy of Pediatrics v. FDA.

Back in July 2017, then-FDA commissioner Dr. Scott Gottlieb extended the SE report deadline to August 2021, and this deadline was recognized by Judge Mehta.

FDA

More in Legislation

See all
FDA Extends Comment Period for Cigar Approval Rule Proposal

FDA Extends Comment Period for Cigar Approval Rule Proposal

Originally set to end today, the FDA says it will continue accepting public feedback until December …

Nov 25, 2019
Anti-Smoking Bill That Would Have Banned Catalog and Internet Sales Exempts Premium Cigars

Anti-Smoking Bill That Would Have Banned Catalog and Internet Sales Exempts Premium Cigars

A bill that sought to ban internet and catalog sales of all tobacco products now has an exemption for …

Nov 19, 2019
Anti-Smoking Bill That Would Ban Catalog and Internet Sales of Tobacco Passes Subcommittee

Anti-Smoking Bill That Would Ban Catalog and Internet Sales of Tobacco Passes Subcommittee

Today in Washington, the House Energy and Commerce Committee’s Health Subcommittee passed H.R. 2339, …

Nov 13, 2019
Trump Nominates Cancer Specialist to Head FDA

Trump Nominates Cancer Specialist to Head FDA

Dr. Stephen Hahn has been tapped by Trump to lead the government agency that oversees tobacco …

Nov 1, 2019
Cigar Industry Argues FDA Warnings in Appeals Court

Cigar Industry Argues FDA Warnings in Appeals Court

The cigar industry earlier today argued in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Washington D.C. Circuit, …

Oct 29, 2019
Proposal That Would Have Increased Cigar Taxes Defeated

Proposal That Would Have Increased Cigar Taxes Defeated

A bill introduced last month that sought to dramatically increase the federal tax on premium cigars …

Oct 25, 2019