Tuesday, April 15, 2014
CAO Flathead Adds New Size
Monday, April 14, 2014
Room 101 Announces Daruma Gold
Wednesday, April 9, 2014
Room 101 Store Opens Inside Davidoff Flagship
Tuesday, April 8, 2014
Non-Cubans Go Global
Monday, April 7, 2014
Upmann Depositing Banker in Humidors This Month
- More from News & Features
California Bill Would Ban Smoking in Some Homes
Posted: June 4, 2013
The right to light up at home is in jeopardy for some California cigar smokers as a bill that would ban smoking in multifamily dwellings is gaining traction in the state's Assembly.
Introduced by Assemblyman Marc Levine, D-San Rafael, AB 746 seeks to amend the current state smoking ban by adding language that would prohibit smoking any type of tobacco product inside any residential property that contains "two or more units with one or more shared walls, floors, ceilings, or ventilation systems." In other words, apartment buildings, townhouses and condominiums would fall under the new legislation.
If the bill were to pass, the only smoking permitted in a multifamily dwelling would be in designated areas at least 20 feet away from the residential units. Additionally, designated smoking areas would have to be clearly marked and at least 100 feet away from areas primarily used by children and those that "facilitate physical activity including playgrounds, swimming pools, and school campuses."
The bill states that violators of the new rules would receive a written warning for a first offense, a fine of up to $100 for a second offense and a fine up to $200 for a third violation.
For some California residents, though, violating the proposed legislation could lead to eviction from their residence. In cities such as Santa Monica, rental laws ensure renters can only be evicted from their homes with just cause.
Violating the new smoking measure would legally be a criminal infraction, hence enough just cause to be evicted. For this reason, Santa Monica City Council is opposing the bill as it is currently written.
Glynn Loope, executive director of the Cigar Rights of America, called the proposal "totally unnecessary and another example of nanny-state government," as landlords already have the authority to ban smoking on their own property.
"Assemblyman Levine obviously has no respect for private property rights, by this attempt to criminalize the use of legal tobacco products within the confines of a home," said Loope. "There are cases where citizens have actually confronted homelessness over regulations such as this."
Levine's bill was actually defeated in a 5 to 2 vote when it was first read in the Committee of Housing and Community Development. However, the bill has since been resurrected.
Comments 16 comment(s)
Daryl Wall — Calgary, AB, Canada, — June 4, 2013 5:01pm ET
Frederick Amodeo — Bellport, New York, USA, — June 4, 2013 6:58pm ET
Marc Lewis — Macon, Georgia, United States, — June 4, 2013 9:37pm ET
Geoff LaTulippe — Los Angeles, — June 5, 2013 12:02am ET
Curtis Harned — Festus, Missouri, United States, — June 5, 2013 1:09am ET
Gary Roberti — Toms River, NJ, USA, — June 5, 2013 8:15am ET
Christian — June 5, 2013 9:01am ET
Toar — Simi Valley, Ca, — June 5, 2013 10:01am ET
Patrick Morales — Covina, California, United States, — June 5, 2013 10:49am ET
Jim Chavez — Belmont, Ca., US, — June 5, 2013 1:45pm ET
chris garcia — ca, usa, — June 5, 2013 7:12pm ET
Preston Weiters Jr. — Jersey City, NJ, US, — June 5, 2013 11:27pm ET
Robert — June 10, 2013 11:17am ET
Thomas ORourke — June 14, 2013 6:58pm ET
Michael Tarone — Bellefonte, PA, USA, — June 16, 2013 12:33am ET
Leopold — July 19, 2013 11:46am ET
You must be logged in to post a comment.