![]() |
See Also:
-
Tuesday, May 21, 2013
EXCLUSIVE—Nat Sherman To Debut 1930 Collection -
Monday, May 20, 2013
El Centurion Hitting Store Shelves -
Thursday, May 16, 2013
La Gloria Launching First Nicaraguan Lines -
Wednesday, May 15, 2013
North Carolina Bill Would Allow Outdoor Smoking -
Tuesday, May 14, 2013
Altadis Releasing Next Generation Saint Luis Rey - More from News & Features
Judge Blocks New FDA-Mandated Graphic Cigarette Warnings
Andrew Nagy
Posted: November 8, 2011
A
federal judge on Monday blocked a Food and Drug Administration
requirement that would have forced cigarette makers to affix graphic
warning labels to their products beginning next year.
Some
of the graphic images the FDA sought to mandate as warnings included a
cloud of smoke near a newborn’s face, lips with what appear to be
lesions growing on them, and, perhaps the most provocative of all, a
dead smoker lying on an autopsy table with stitches in his chest and the
words “Smoking can kill you” underneath.
United
States District Judge Richard Leon ruled that the images bordered on
advocacy and infringed on the tobacco companies’ right to free speech,
according to an Associated Press report.
"It
is abundantly clear from viewing these images that the emotional
response they were crafted to induce is calculated to provoke the viewer
to quit, or never to start smoking—an objective wholly apart from
disseminating purely factual and uncontroversial information," Leon
wrote in his 29-page opinion.
Three
cigarette makers, including a subsidiary of Britain's Imperial Tobacco
Group PLC (the parent company of Altadis S.A.) had sued the FDA in August, claiming
the new packaging requirements breached their
right to free speech.
The
FDA’s move on warning labels originated in 2009, only months after the
agency was granted control over the U.S. tobacco industry. And while
these warning labels would only have applied to cigarettes, people in
the cigar industry fear that such regulation could one day be applied to
cigars. It’s not without precedent. Cigars sold in Mexico, for example,
must carry graphic warnings very similar to the one struck down in this
ruling.
While
FDA had an immediate impact on the cigarette industry—banning all
flavored cigarettes save for menthol, limiting the release of new
products, limiting advertising and placing restrictions on the use of
words such as "light"—and other tobacco products, the cigar industry
remained largely unrestricted.
In
2010, though, the agency publicly declared it intends to regulate
premium cigars, too. As a response, the Cigar Rights of America and the
International Premium Cigars & Pipe Retailers association have been
involved with introducing two bills, S. 1461 and H.R. 1639, that aim to
remove the FDA’s jurisdiction over the premium cigar industry.
Comments 8 comment(s)
C — November 9, 2011 3:34pm ET
C — November 9, 2011 3:34pm ET
Good on the judge who declared this be an infringement on free speech as it is. This is nothing more than an attempt to control what people can purchase. Why aren't there pictures of grossly obese people when you enter a fast food chain? Simply government’s attempt to pick and choose what THEY think is good for us. Very un-American.
ericwalker968 — November 9, 2011 4:26pm ET
Smokeing is bad for you that is ture.
BUT SO IS
Fast Food
Drinking
Drugs
So what if I want to enjoy a cigar I've waited the long years to become age in order to enjoy one again the goverment trying to control what we buy or don't buy
audyaver — November 9, 2011 8:20pm ET
Test Comment
JustoneCoolcat — November 10, 2011 4:27am ET
OK Life is good, right.... not,
Indians, life was good and still is, right
Indians somked, right....
Indians somked tobacco, nothing happen to them. |
Cigars are nothing but pure tobacco, I know
a few Cubians and American Nativas Indians whos still burn. Nothing wrong with them health wise.
F.D.A What are you looking for?
smoke
kent@confidenthair.com.au — November 12, 2011 5:46am ET
Glad to hear the judgement. we have those ridiculous pictures on the cigarette packets here in Australia. Now they have just passed legislation so all packets are to be sold in plain green packs from next December. But the tobacco companies are about take our Government to court for infringement of intilectual property rights, amongst other things. Either the courts will uphold the appeal and the legislation will fail or it will pass, but then I cannot see how our government(australian tax payers) can get out of not paying the tobacco companies compensation each year for the removal of their trade marks from their products.
Anti smokers say this is good but believe me today it is tobacco tomorrow it will be alchol and fast foods. These are already in the sights of minority, activists, groups here.
Welcome to 1950s Communist Russia, sorry 2011 Australia. The difference is getting very difficult to see.
Jason Kayorie — November 13, 2011 5:45pm ET
Up in Canada we've had graphic warning labels on cigars for a few years. I can tell you they've done nothing to stop new smokers from starting nor make old smokers quit. Most people just ignore them, some hurl insults toward the government’s interference for trying to tell them what to do. I’ve even had people request specific "warnings" so that they can add to their collection, said people have even been thrilled when new images are introduced. It's like collecting baseball cards for them. It’s just a waste of time and money, only furthered by the years long legal process.
dave@ci.com.au — November 14, 2011 1:38am ET
Australia has become a bizzare combination of fascist nanny state with regard to protecting its citizens from themselves.
Plain packaging will be even more of a pain in the butt for the retailers who currently have to keep one of their more commonly items out of eyesight in cabinets.
The governments don't have the balls to just come out and ban cigarettes but they have been progressively will make it such that it won't be worth the hassle of selling them.
If the more rabid anti-smoking advocates get their way, us big tough Aussies will need to have a smoking license to go along with our gambling license and our I'm big enough to cross the street by my self license...
The governments, both state and federal, don't have the balls to just come out and ban cigarettes but they have been progressively will make it such that it won't be worth the hassle of selling them.
You must be logged in to post a comment.



RSS
Good on the judge who declared this be an infringement on free speech as it is. This is nothing more than an attempt to control what people can purchase. Why aren't there pictures of grossly obese people when you enter a fast food chain? Simply government’s attempt to pick and choose what THEY think is good for us. Very un-American.