![]() Photo/Wikimedia |
See Also:
-
Tuesday, June 18, 2013
Cigar Sales Up For Davidoff Group -
Monday, June 17, 2013
Major Expansion for Kristoff Brand -
Thursday, June 13, 2013
Ashton Releasing ESG 24 Year Salute -
Tuesday, June 11, 2013
Exclusive First Look—Davidoff Nicaragua -
Monday, June 10, 2013
Camacho Revamps Blends, Updates Packaging - More from News & Features
Austin’s Precautionary Burn Ban May Become Permanent
Andrew Nagy
Posted: October 24, 2011
Lawmakers
in Austin, Texas, took steps last Thursday to extend the temporary burn
ban passed there in April into an injunction that would permanently
eliminate smoking in the city’s parks and some of its golf courses.
The
Austin City Council unanimously passed a resolution asking City Manager
Marc Ott to draft an ordinance that prohibits smoking in the city’s
Parks and Recreation sites, which includes 251 parks, public pools and
some golf courses. For Ott’s draft to become a law, though, the Parks
and Recreation Department must first approve and amend it, and City
Council must then vote to adopt the final document.
City
park smoking bans are not that unusual (534 cities, 29 of which are in
Texas, already have smoke-free parks), but what could distinguish
Austin’s ban from those in other cities is it would the first to stem
from a burn ban.
Travis
County, where Austin is located, has been enduring terrible drought
conditions since last year and has been under a burn ban since December
14, 2010, according to the county Fire Marshal’s office. Essentially,
the burn ban prohibits any combustible material—fireworks, barbecues,
cigarettes and cigars—that could spark a forest fire from being used
within the city’s Park and Recreation sites.
The
seemingly dubious manner in which a precautionary burn order may evolve
into a permanent smoking ban has caught the eye of smoking ban
opponents.
According
to impactnews.com, a representative from the Austin Golf Advisory Group
named Delano Womack addressed the Council on Thursday to explain that
cigar smoking often takes place on a golf course. While Council members
did not immediately strike golf courses from the resolution, a few
agreed that they may fall into some sort of middle ground, and so a note
was added that ensured the Golf Advisory Group would be able to look
over any wording associated with golf courses in Ott’s draft.
Glynn
Loope, executive director of the Cigar Rights of America, added: "While
we sympathize with the situation the weather has caused, creating very
dry conditions and hence making smoking or a family barbecue hazardous
at times in local parks, it is obvious City Council is using the weather
as a cloak for the public health agenda.”
Loope
says the CRA also will be sending the Council a copy of an editorial by
Dr. Michael Siegel of the Boston University School of Public Health
that states there is questionable scientific validity to outdoor smoking
bans. The editorial, according to Loope, also states that city park
bans like the one Austin is proposing “may actually increase exposure by
creating smoke-filled areas near park entrances that cannot be
avoided.”
Comments 3 comment(s)
Float Dub — October 25, 2011 12:31pm ET
George C — Commack, NY, USA, — October 25, 2011 5:21pm ET
Bloomberg syndrome...
Brandon Fedor — Austin, TX, USA, — October 25, 2011 8:27pm ET
Golf courses. You read that correctly.
Hopefully I'll still be able to smoke in my backyard in the next ten years....
You must be logged in to post a comment.



RSS
Look for this to happen in Houston next.