|
Home > People Index Page > David Tang
New World Man
A Mass of Contradictions Wrapped in an Enigma, Businessman/Impresario/ Bon Vivante David Tang Seems Singularly Poised to Deal With Whatever Hong Kong's Future Brings
by Orville Schell
Each day as lunchtime approaches, the faithful begin to hive
toward the old Bank of China building overlooking Statue Square in
Central Hong Kong. Files of young men carrying smart leather
briefcases and sporting double-breasted Italian suits converge with
clutches of svelte young women with flawless makeup and the latest
European businesswear fashions at a side door. Here, a single elevator
takes members up to the China Club, the beating heart of Hong Kong for
this new up-and-coming generation of entrepreneurs. Here in the club's
private dining rooms and banquet hall, nouveaux Chinese taipans and
ex-pat moguls-in-the-making dine, see and be seen, and clinch the
kinds of deals that have made Asia the world's boomtown.
However, among this Armani-ed elite, there is often one lone
figure who is as visually out of place as the handful of rickshaw
pullers across the square who wait for gullible tourists at the Star
Ferry. Clad in a high-collared Chinese scholar's gown or a traditional
silk jacket with pajama-like trousers and cloth slippers, clutching an
enormous Cuban Cohiba like a scepter, he appears like someone out of a
time warp. Actually, he is David Wing-cheung Tang (known to his
foreign friends as Tango), 42-year-old businessman, culture vulture,
social moth and the China Club's grand progenitor.
As one of Hong Kong's best known public figures, Tang is playing
an unusual role in defining a new identity for young Chinese who are
emerging as leaders of this Crown colony as it heads towards its hour
of reckoning on July 1, the date on which Hong Kong, after 155 years
of British imperial rule, will become a sovereign part of the People's
Republic of China. But tonight, as liveried Jaguars and Mercedes drop
their charges off outside the China Club for one of the many
salon-style events at which Tang holds court as he tirelessly
schmoozes with the colony's haute monde and globe-trotting
celebrities, the approaching hour of Hong Kong's convergence with the
"democratic dictatorship of the proletariat" to the north still seems
remote.
Indeed, as soon as one steps out of the elevator into the China
Club's 13th-floor lobby, the moment of reversion is all the more
unthinkable. Instead of being catapulted into the future, one is
plunged into the past--into a meticulously replicated, splendid, 1920s
Art Deco environment that hearkens back to the glory days of Shanghai
before the Second World War. Here, surrounded by dark wood paneling, a
curved staircase sweeping upwards, acres of Tiffany glasswork,
marble-topped tables and ceiling fans, David Tang's retrograde
sartorial look seems suddenly completely in style.
Tonight, Tang is holding court upstairs in the banquet room. Clad
in one of his traditional hand-tailored mandarin silk suits, he might
almost be mistaken for some parody of an over-aged Chinese
houseboy--except that he is waving his ever-present cigar and
introducing guests to each other with manic enthusiasm (never mind if
he doesn't get all the names quite right)--in short, presiding over
the party with Proustian aplomb. Has writer Jan Morris (who has just
updated her classic book on Hong Kong) met Jung Chang (author of
Wild Swans)? Has international celebrity and fashion maven Diane Von
Furstenberg (who has just arrived on a tour) met tonight's pianist,
Brenda Lucas Ogdon? Tang is a gale force of networking energy--a
veritable Chinese Pearl Mesta.
At first glance it is tempting to view the China Club as just
another celebrity watering hole and Tang as an almost comical
throwback to a bygone era. In actuality, the China Club is a much more
interesting place and David Tang a far more complex and fascinating
figure than such a superficial view might suggest. The club has become
a roundhouse for all the forces that are shaping Hong Kong and Asia,
while Tang himself has become both a symbol of and a catalyst for a
newly evolving Chinese identity. As Andrew Higgins, Hong Kong
correspondent for the British paper, The Guardian, only half jokingly
put it, "Tang is much more interesting than he pretends to be."
"He's one of those rare people who cheers the world up," says Hong
Kong Gov. Chris Patten. "Life and Hong Kong would be much poorer
without him."
Indeed, watching the bonhomie with which Tang mixes among the
evening's guests from within his own little atmospheric haze of cigar
smoke that invariably surrounds him, there is no doubt that he and his
club are at the center of a social hot spot. But what makes Tang so
interesting is not just that he is socially ambitious or successful in
business--which is nothing special in Hong Kong--but that he is also a
polymath who dabbles in culture and politics as well. As such, he is
playing a fascinating role in helping to fashion a new syncretic
identity for both Hong Kong and China's up-and-coming generation. It
is an identity that borrows randomly--and sometimes flamboyantly--from
both East and West, as well as the past and present, and that does not
shrink back from pop culture and commercialization.
One of his signature emblems is an omnipresent Cohiba, an
interesting story in itself. Tang is the chairman of the Pacific Cigar
Co. Ltd. (which controls the Cuban cigar franchise for Canada and the
whole Asia/Pacific region) and the owner of the Cigar Divan, a shop
dedicated entirely to Cuban cigars, located in the lobby of the
classically elegant Mandarin Oriental Hotel. Tang tells me that he
became acquainted with cigars after he got into university in
England. "My father gave me a Romeo y Julieta in a tin tube and told
me, 'Now you're a man,' " he recalls fondly. "So, naturally I smoked
it, and because it was so mild, I thought I could take on any large
cigar." He laughs. "Anyway, I became hooked and became a passionate
cigar smoker."
And how did he come to be the purveyor of cigars to Asia?
"Ah! That's another story," he says with a snort of
laughter. "Years later, back in Hong Kong, I heard that there was a
row between Davidoff and Cuba and I thought there might be an
opportunity there and ended up getting the Cuban cigar franchise for
Asia, that had been going nowhere. Then I went to Havana and
ultimately opened the Cigar Divan at the Mandarin Oriental."
This small shop tucked behind the elevators is far more than a
cigar stand. It is a stunningly appointed little grotto, manned by
knowledgeable clerks, with couches and chairs where cigar aficionados
can gather to talk, read periodicals, discuss cigar kultur and, of
course, smoke a nice Upmann, Montecristo or Partagas. The Divan
infuses the lobby of the Mandarin with a subtle but tantalizingly rich
aroma of the best cigars in the world, giving this already august
hotel all the more the feeling of being the place in Hong Kong where
true club-going English gentlemen convene when "in the Orient."
"When we opened in l992, we only had about 10 customers a day,"
manager Teddy Liam says. "Now we get about 120 people coming in every
day. I think it's the influence of all the Hollywood movie stars
smoking cigars. Anyway, we can't keep enough stock to supply everyone,
especially Cohibas."
That there is a scarcity despite the fact that Tang's "allocation"
from Cuba has tripled since last year gives a suggestion of the
booming popularity of cigars in Hong Kong. Indeed, one can hardly find
a hotel lobby, pub or restaurant where someone is not smoking a fat
cigar these days. Tang says that the Cigar Divan has been so
successful that he is now spreading his cigar gospel across Asia by
opening branches in the Mandarin Oriental hotels in Bangkok, Djakarta
and Singapore.
When I last spoke with Tang, he had just returned from a lavish
cigar fest in Havana given by Fidel Castro and celebrating the Cohiba,
once the Cuban president's own brand (see related story on page
138). "At dinner, Castro got up and gave a long speech covering
everything from why he threw the party to why he gave up cigars,"
mused Tang. Then as if he were feeling Castro's pain for having given
up this once chronic vice, he added, "What a pity it is that Clinton
can't enjoy a nice Havana!"
Tang has also opened a department store--Shanghai Tang--which
sells contemporary chinoiserie, all of which is made in China. His
specialities--which some have dubbed "nostal-chic" or
"Mao-chic"--include the traditional-style silk suits he himself wears
(advertised as "Tang suits"), lime green and bright red velvet Mao
jackets, velvet Mao caps, sweatshirts with PRC flags emblazoned on the
fronts in various colors, Day-Glo-hued cashmere sweaters, Mao
wristwatches, Peoples Liberation Army knives, Mao and Whitney Houston
place mats, and Cultural Revolution T-shirts, all purveyed by Chinese
clerks in traditional garb in gaudy contemporary colors. His
intention, claims Tang, is to create "the first recognizable Chinese
brand" (billed as "the emperor's new clothes") and to market it
globally in order "to glorify China" and "bring its traditions the
recognition they deserve."
Perhaps Tang's most important accomplishments, however, are not
his commercial ventures, but the way the collectivity of his
activities has begun to articulate a sense of self-confident,
indigenous Chinese style that has also, surprisingly enough, begun to
seize the international imagination. For instance, almost no visiting
foreign "player" feels quite complete now unless his trip to Hong Kong
includes a meal at the China Club. What is so new about the club is
that it is an oasis where Chinese and Western sensibilities merge as
equals. Although such a cultural synthesis has been long dreamed about
by Chinese intellectuals and reformers who have chafed under China's
inferiority before Western technological and commercial dominance, it
has never before been accomplished quite so successfully. What is
distinctive about Tang is that he is one of the few Asians in Asia who
seem to genuinely feel comfortable on both sides of the East-West
divide.
One could go so far as to say that until Chinese in general
reacquire such a convincing new sense of cultural identity and
self-worth, they will continue to lack the self-confidence that is so
essential in overcoming the historical inferiority complex growing out
of the last century and a half of unequal relations with the West.
In many ways David Tang is an unlikely figure to be straddling
this fault line between East and West, much less to be brokering
between China's post-modern Marxist-Leninist regime and neo-colonial
Britain as this remnant colony counts down the days to reversion. Tang
is a large, bear-like man with a ruddy face and a somewhat rumpled
countenance whose patrician manner, enjoyment of the good life and
disarmingly easygoing (if sometimes distracted) manner have won him
many influential friends.
Born in Hong Kong into a wealthy family on Aug. 2, 1954, David
Tang was sent to Britain at age 13 for schooling. Unable to speak
English, he was refused admission at Eton and Harrow and instead ended
up at the Perse School in Cambridge, where he was the only Chinese boy
in residence. "I was so lonely in England because I had such a
language problem," he recalls. "Always I had a sense of how alien I
was. The struggle gave me a huge complex, but it did plunge me into
reading, music and chess as an escape."
Tang later studied philosophy at King's College, London
University, and then law at the University's College of Law. While in
England, he not only learned to speak a flawless Oxbridge English that
is every bit as arch as that of the royals, but picked up many of the
affectations of a latter-day British gentleman. Indeed, when Tang
switches suddenly from English to his native Cantonese (which to
Western ears can sound like so many angry ducks quacking), he creates
a feeling of supreme cognitive dissonance. But the contrast is a
perfect emblem of the contradictory sides of David Tang's hybrid
personality and the myriad different projects and businesses in which
he has involved himself. He is chairman of The China Club Ltd.,
Shanghai Tang Department Store Ltd., D.W.C. Tang Development Ltd. and
the Pacific Cigar Co. He is managing director of Cluff Investments
& Trading Ltd. and the China Investment Fund, and a member of
endless other corporate boards. But he is also a pianist of some
accomplishment; has dabbled in teaching philosophy at Beijing
University; is an art dealer of wide repute and co-owner of Hong
Kong's foremost contemporary art gallery, Hanart TZ; and, as honorary
consul for Cuba in Hong Kong and a renowned mingler with itinerant
members of the international foreign policy establishment, is even a
diplomat of sorts.
As the night's chummy gathering progresses under Tang's watchful
eye, a flotilla of waiters stand at attention in a mutant form of
white Mao suit with red PLA patches on the collars and yellow stars on
the lapels, part of the tongue-in-cheek, neo-Big Leader fashion trend
that Tang has created, gently spoofing Chinese communist kultur. "I'd
dress them much more outrageously," he whispers, "but you know I'm
always walking a fine line with the Chinese."
What makes Tang such a social as well as political and economic
cement mixer is that his China Club includes not only local Chinese
and ex-pats as members, but also an increasing number of Party
officials and Mainland businessmen who have been moving into the
colony from across the border. The fact that Tang's signature is an
indelibly capitalist emblem seems not to bother these latter-day
socialists. In fact, among the wealth of celebrity photos on display
in the lobby are shots both of Zhou Nan, the head of Xin Hua, the New
China News Agency (China's unofficial "embassy" in Hong Kong), and
British Vice Premier Michael Hesseltine, who were present for the
club's opening in l991. Then, for the club's third anniversary, Tang
had two banquets, one for Governor Patten, the Brits and those friends
who are not China boosters, and one for Zhang Junsheng, deputy
director of Xin Hua, and the pro-China crowd. "That's David Tang
playing both sides," says the Times of London Asia editor Jonathan
Mirsky. "And he's fantastic at it. He must be the most socially
inclusive and visible person in Hong Kong." Whether it involves
Princess Di, the Duchess of York, financier Jimmy Goldsmith and
intellectual Isiah Berlin, or Oliver Stone, Fidel Castro, Richard
Gere, Deng Xiaoping and his artist daughter, Deng Lin, it seems that
no social or political contradiction is too antagonistic for Tang's
embrace. Tang once told an interviewer that he even had an ambition to
get the Prince of Wales and Deng Xiaoping together. Alas, that task
will now have to wait for eternity.
What is telling is that Tang can even imagine embracing aspects of
these two once so different universes. "When I was growing up here in
Hong Kong, it seemed as if Beijing was six thousand miles away," says
Tang when asked about his childhood in Hong Kong. "We looked to
London, not Beijing, and I can remember my grandfather, who was a
pillar of Hong Kong society, being almost unctuous toward the British
administration here." (With a wry laugh Tang later says that he can
still remember how, during the Cultural Revolution, Communist Bank of
China officials used to stand with bullhorns on the very balcony now
occupied by the China Club and "shout down to incite the people below
to attack the Brits, the foreign devils.") "But now Beijing is just
across the border, l997 is upon us, things are changing and I like to
imagine myself as a kind of broker between China and the West."
After coffee and cigars (also offered to the women) Tang rises
from his chair at the head of the table and, like a potentate of a
small country addressing his subjects, introduces the evening's
program of Bach, Schumann, Chopin and Gershwin. Tang takes great
delight in his role as cultural impresario. Indeed, what has made the
China Club such a mecca for Hong Kong movers and shakers is its
promise of being more than just a place to do business. It not only
hosts recitals, but occasional literary and poetry readings as well
and it contains an impressive art gallery. "The club offers just
enough of a patina of culture, politics and celebrity allure to be
enticing without being overwhelming," comments one thirtysomething
member who is in the satellite television business. Nothing, however,
is taken overly seriously. After all, how serious about "culture" can
businessmen who make their millions in real estate or the garment
trade be while making deals surrounded by vases of peacock feathers
and woodcuts of model PLA soldiers in the Long March Bar?
"A bit of culture," Tang pronounces with a regal wave of his
Cohiba. "Somebody has to keep a little culture going around here,
don't you know. And I really like to do this sort of thing. Never mind
if only a handful come, I like to do it anyway." He winks and takes a
satisfied drag on his cigar. Then wagging an admonishing forefinger,
he adds, "But no more than an hour for the music, because anything
longer than that here in Hong Kong is too long."
If China Club members have a limited tolerance for classical
music--and probably for Tang's deeper thoughts as well--most seem to
enjoy the spectacular exhibition of contemporary Chinese art that
hangs everywhere in the club. Put together with Johnson Tsong-Zung
Chang, a brilliant curator with whom Tang owns the Hanart TZ Gallery
downstairs, the 350 works in the China Club's collection consist not
only of original paintings for old Maoist posters, campy socialist
realist oils of the "Dear Leader" school of art and kitschy Communist
bric-a-brac, but an extensive collection of post-Mao avant-garde
paintings that mine the iconography of China's revolution and the dark
side of Mao's megalomania in an ironic way that manages to be both
oblique and affecting.
Among the best-known paintings is a Yu Youhan version of Mao
attired in a floral Laura Ashley Mao suit, Wang Guangyi's militant
worker heroes saluting a Tang breakfast drink logo, Yu Youhan's
Chairman Mao and Whitney Houston, and a marvelous high-camp ceramic
sculpture of Mao surrounded by stereotypes of adoring Third World
revolutionary compatriots: a Mexican in a sombrero, an African woman
in a nappy, an Albanian in regulation oppressed-peasant overalls, an
Arab in a kafir and a Red Guard girl ardently hugging Mao's
arm. Everyone is, of course, smiling deliriously with socialist
intoxication.
The presence of this extraordinary collection makes the China Club
more than just a clever replication of old Shanghai for young
culturally defoliated businessmen in search of ersatz atmosphere. The
fact that Tang has done so much to introduce China's new wave of
iconoclastic artists to the outside world puts him on the cultural
cutting edge and gives the China Club an air of being authentic,
something that is rare in this international city where so much is
borrowed and simulated from elsewhere.
"I created the China Club to be the kind of place I'd like to go
to myself," Tang says. "Maybe for most it's just a kind of museum
where they can eat and hold events, but I think that everyone feels
somehow proud to be associated with it"--proud enough to remain on a
long waiting list and then pay a $25,000 membership fee (corporate
fees are $55,000) for the privilege of joining. Tang and his
co-owner, T.T. Tsui, claim to have already earned nearly $30 million
in memberships.
What is so unprecedented about the vortex of energy and activity
that swirls around Tang and the China Club is that until its opening
in l991, there was little socializing between Chinese and the
British/ex-pat community in Hong Kong. There had been even less
between Hong Kong residents and Mainlanders who were known mostly for
their Maoist rhetoric, badly cut suits and social ineptitude. But
through Tang's style of celebrity matchmaking between East and West,
this three-way divide has started to be bridged. By doing more and
more business and traveling on both sides of the border, a new
generation of Chinese that views itself not so much as being from Hong
Kong or Shanghai but as being just "Chinese" is coming to the fore. To
be around Tang on this widening but still narrow littoral, where these
once dissimilar and separate worlds have started to overlap, is to be
in a new world.
And how do comrades from Beijing take to his cigars? "Well, yes,"
Tang says with an upper-class English harrumph. "Cigars are truly the
greatest symbols of big capitalists, aren't they? I wouldn't think
party leaders in Beijing would ever be caught dead with one in their
hands. To see a Communist with a big fat corona or robusto would be a
bit surreal, wouldn't it!"
Despite the many obvious differences in the way people live, think
and are governed on each side of the border, Chinese on both sides are
collectively searching for cultural roots in a process that has begun
to evince a new nationalist pride. That this growing sense of
"Chinese-ness" has become tinged with patriotism--and not infrequently
more than a little arrogance and anti-foreignism--is an aspect of
Asia's economic renaissance that has surprised many, especially when
it has found expression here in Hong Kong. But as Tang explains, "More
and more I have come to view China as my future, just as it is also
the future of Hong Kong." In fact, he has just opened another China
Club, this one in an old palace courtyard complexin Beijing that was
once the Sichuan Restaurant, where he may be able to become more a
junzi, a "Confucian gentleman," than a British dandy.
Although David Tang is one of the most highly visible members of
that new generation of Chinese that will lead Asia into the next
century, and although in many respects he is a very hip and
sophisticated man, he also has an emphatically Luddite side. Nowhere
is this more obvious than in his views on the electronic
revolution. When asked his thoughts about the information highway, he
becomes animated, but in an almost self-defensive way.
"It's bad enough to have to drive on highways, much less to have
to deal with an information highway," he splutters, as if he finds the
very question somehow offensive. "If people want to find things out,
they should just go to the library. Even though I love contemporary
things, I think old things usually prove to be the best."
When I remind Tang that, like it or not, the electronic
information age is upon us and is creating a new frontier, he says,
"Well, I think it has had less influence than people think. Three
hundred years ago when it took five days to deliver a letter, you had
people wanting to read. Now you can instantly talk to anyone and get
all kinds of information, but it has made people want to read
less. Information has gotten to be like junk mail, and getting e-mail
is just like tapping into an aquifer of junk mail. It's overwhelmed
us, and the human brain works best when it is not overwhelmed. Only an
exceptional person can really master all that information. Ordinary
people just get put off and confused."
Does he ever go on-line? "I don't have the time to read the books
I want to read, so where would I find time to turn on the computer?"
he replies disputatiously. "I don't even read modern novels because
there are so many classics I haven't gotten around to. If I had to
read Jane Austen on a screen, that wouldn't be so wonderful, would it?
Anyway, I prefer to collect first editions. In my mind there is no
better interior decoration than shelves of books. When I enter a room
without books, I feel aghast and immediately want to leave! I love to
be surrounded by books! I want to be able to reach for books wherever
I am, to hold them in my hands!
"You know, I got a big biography of Cecil Rhodes the other day,
and when I opened it up--oh, the smell was simply marvelous!" Tang
closes his eyes and inhales as if he is smelling the wrapper of one of
his best Cuban cigars. "The aroma of an old book is wonderful! You
can't smell a computer! I even love writers like Sax Rohmer, who
created Fu Manchu, and Van Gulik, who created Judge Dee. And there's
another thing. If I had more time at my disposal, the last thing I'd
want to do was read more e-mail." He sighs. "So you can see that I'm
obviously not one of those who believes that the world is going to
come up roses just because of the information revolution. If that were
true, wouldn't the world already be in full bloom?"
To honor his notion of books as sacred objects, the China Club
even has its own library, which is, indeed, the antithesis of the
modern computer room/media lab. With its leather couches, fireplace,
chess table, spiral staircase up to a gallery and distinctive smell of
old books, one feels in a world that is a contradiction of Hong Kong's
glass-walled high-rises and polished granite lobbies.
Everything David Tang does is done with great attention to
authentic detail, so that even when he is re-creating a feeling of the
past, there is no hint of cheesiness. For authenticity sake, the
library even has antique glass cases for displaying rare books. During
my visit they contained such offerings as: "Reports from His Majesty's
Ministers at Peking Respecting the Opium Trade" and "Papers Relating
to the Murder of Six Englishmen in the Neighborhood of Hong Kong in
the Month of December 1847."
Seven floors below in the old Bank of China building is one of
Tang's more contemporary projects, the Hanart TZ Gallery. This morning
Tang is in residence, puffing on a cigar and choosing paintings from
the gallery's large collection for a show that will open the same
evening.
All morning, Tang struts around the gallery looking at paintings
and delivering a running discourse on whatever is going through his
head. Nowhere does his sense of garrulous self-enjoyment manifest
itself better than in such a situation where he can putter around
contemporary art with his old friend, Johnson Chang, drink tea, snack
on dim sum, puff on a cigar and hold forth. Under Tang's tutelage,
Chang has also become a devotee of fine cigars and traditional Chinese
gowns, so that when the two are together they look like Sinicized Marx
Brothers.
"I wanted to do a whole Mao art show; after all, it's part of
China's historical heritage," Tang says, looking at a huge
red-and-black pastel of the chairman commissioned in the early 1970s
by a Manchurian poster company. "But you have to be so careful about
the party's sensibilities. Since they've squeezed literature, film and
politics so, one of the few cultural places open where people can
still express themselves is through art, which is why I like it
so. It's one of the few places where excess and decadence can be
expressed. Actually, in my view what we need is more decadence,
because decadence allows for diversity."
Tang certainly does have a Falstaffian side that flirts with
decadence, but it is so unabashed and unrepentant and seems to bring
enjoyment to so many, that it is hard to fault it. However, just
before we met at the gallery, Beijing's New China News Agency had
issued a scathing dispatch that seemed to have him and his lifestyle
in mind. It attacked "upstarts who try to recreate old lifestyles from
before the Communist takeover in l949" and "wallow in depravity." It
called such people "no better than silk-clad, imperial parasites fed
on a diet of luxury."
"Oh, well," sighs Tang, exhaling a fatalistic plume of Fidelista
cigar smoke. "Yes, they do say things like that from time to
time. They just can't help themselves." For a moment he stares off
into space.
"I rather like this one. Yes, I do," Tang says, suddenly snapping
to attention as gallery manager Caroline Chiu presents another
painting. "But that one is a bit contrived," he says, gesturing toward
another painting and then settling into an armchair where he removes
his traditional-style slippers. "Sometimes I get so passionate about
art that I hate it when a painting I buy appreciates in value because,
given the Hong Kong mentality, then I must sell it and make money!"
Is Hong Kong much interested in contemporary Chinese art? "I guess
you'd have to say that Hong Kong is not particularly interested in any
art," he replies diffidently. "The Mainland's no better. I mean, look
at the way Beijing's architectural heritage has been destroyed. Their
new conception of architecture seems to be a high-rise with a limp
effort to make it Chinese by putting a kitsch pagoda on the top. It's
so sad! Where has all our art and craftsmanship gone? Where's the old
poetry? We were once the center of art. You see in this gallery a
demonstration that Chinese art has a future. But it takes patrons. It
takes time to get people into art. You have to excite and stimulate
them first. The only way to teach anyone anything is to first teach
them a passion for it. But here in Hong Kong, my generation went so
far from our home to be educated that we...well, sure, we got
wonderful Western educations, but we got no grounding in being
Chinese. By going to a British boarding school at age 13, I lost a
golden period of memory. When I came back, I had to make myself learn
Chinese to catch up or I would have completely lost my Chinese-ness
forever. Now those of us who feel inadequate as Chinese want to go
back and find our roots--to attach to what we and China lost."
It is jarring to hear Tang--Hong Kong's most unabashed Chinese
Anglophile, someone who boasts of his personal friendship with
Margaret Thatcher and Chris Patten, who has a house in the London
district of Belgravia and who is a member of White's, the Tory London
gentlemen's club--speaking about "Chinese roots." But the new reality
is that few Chinese, no matter where they live, are immune to the
rising tide of nationalist pride that is growing out of China's
emergence as a major economic force. It is this new pride that is
giving people such as David Tang a way to exercise their long pent up
urge to identify with China.
"I always felt 100 percent Chinese and that there wasn't enough
Chinese-ness in Hong Kong," Tang tells me. "In fact, I always wanted
to be more Chinese. I mean, why do you think I wear this?" He plucks
almost dismissively at his silk suit. "I wear these traditional
clothes to remind myself that I am Chinese. So many Chinese have been
running off to the West to get an education and then returning in
Western business suits. But I think that it's ridiculous for Chinese
to be parading around in those ghastly things! People may think I'm
crazy, but despite my London clubs, cigars and foreign friends, deep
inside I am Chinese. There is something magical about someone going
back to his roots. You just feel it." He sighs. "Over the past 100
years everyone here in Hong Kong has wanted to be foreign. We no
longer have any idea what it means to be Chinese. We are living in a
cultural vacuum. It's basically the same on the Mainland, only they
have the Communist Party. We Chinese don't even make good china
anymore! It's extremely sad that this is the case, but there you have
it."
It sounds as if he might even be on the verge of becoming somewhat
chauvinistic. "Let's just say that I think that the impulse to like
something local is a positive one. I think most Chinese feel a special
blood affinity for China. Look back at all the people who returned to
help reconstruct China when Mao Zedong came along in the early '50s,
only to be completely devastated in the Great Leap Forward and the
Cultural Revolution and then forced to flee to Hong Kong. And now how
many of those very same people--after having made a lot of money--are
now going back again? They can't all be masochists. So the only
explanation I can give is that there is something inexplicable about
being Chinese--something about always wanting to go back to China to
be part of a nation." By now, Tang is speaking with great animation.
Not surprisingly, Tang accepts, possibly even welcomes, the
reversion of Hong Kong to Chinese sovereignty in l997. As he recently
wrote in the British Daily Telegraph, "It would be a loss of face, as
well as unpatriotic, for us to express a bias against the Motherland
in favor of foreign colonial rule." But despite embracing the idea of
this colony being returned to "the Chinese motherland," he is far from
being anti-British, much less pro-Maoist. "I don't want anything to do
with Mao," he tells me, waving a hand as if to banish a bad smell. In
fact, in a recent speech, he extolled British rule. "Whatever one
might say, Britain has provided a stable system of administration in
which Hong Kong inhabitants have been able to flourish magnificently,"
he said. "Hong Kong is, after all, an exceptional example of
excellence under British colonialism and that should command respect
from a great many Chinese here now and beyond l997.
"If ever there was a case to be made for colonialism, Hong Kong
is a shining example--a paradigm of good colonialism," Tang
declared. "It's sad that people don't realize that Hong Kong is an
argument for, not against, colonialism. When people say, 'Thank God
Hong Kong is reverting to China,' they sometimes don't realize that it
would definitely not have been as successful--would not have had such
magical chemistry --without the Brits. It's wrong to subject the
British to an anti-colonial thrashing when their rule is an example of
what colonialism can do and should be extolled for."
When I ask if he thinks China might have something to learn from
British rule, Tang only half-jokingly says, "In fact, I think it would
be nice if China had a constitutional monarchy, and I've often
wondered what would have happened if Chiang Kai-shek had been less
treacherous."
Tang also has a deeply Anglophiliac bias in his notion of personal
relations. "English friends have an absolute sense of loyalty and I
like that," he says. "To me, loyalty through thick and thin is an
admirable virtue that is extremely important--something like the love
of a parent for a child. Loyalty means friendship, and friendship is
what is most important. Your bond with friends should rise above all
other commitments. Laughter with friends is it for me. Here in Hong
Kong, money distorts that loyalty. On the Mainland, it is distorted by
Communism and the party."
"David is an extraordinarily loyal friend," acknowledges longtime
partner Chang.
Does Tang feel at home in Hong Kong?
"Oh yes," Tang replies instantly. "Hong Kong has always been a
place where I feel completely at home. But I wish people knew how to
spend their wealth here, how to treat it as a means to an end instead
of an end in itself."
Mindful that classical music is for Tang a kind of end in itself,
I ask him how he became interested in playing the piano. "When I was
just 15 in England, I heard the falling third of the Brahms fourth and
I was transfixed." He starts waving his arms overhead like a
conductor. "I didn't even know who Brahms was, but it made me want to
start playing the piano right away. Oh, how I wish I could play well!"
he exclaims. A pained look comes over his face. "Music is one of my
passions, and when I play Mozart, I go mad because I know I am not
playing well enough."
What is his favorite type of music? "Well, I'm Catholic, so for me
nothing beats the passion of church music. Unfortunately, these days
the Vatican is like the British monarchy--trying to be more 'in
touch.' But in the process it's killed off too much of the ceremony,
like the singing and the vestments. Of course, that also kills
spirituality and mysticism which both religion and monarchy depend on
to stand up against the mundane world."
Listening to Tang first express patriotic sentiments toward
China--sometimes even joking about the need to start another Taiping
or Boxer Rebellion to purge China of foreigners--and then venerate
British tradition, one may be pardoned for wondering if he is not a
colossal and unreconcilable contradiction. He sees himself, however,
not as a contradiction but as a "benign mediator" between potential
antagonistic world players. "What I enjoy is bringing people
together," he says.
When it's noted that his is an ambitious and grandiose dream, he
says, "If I am ambitious, it is only because I like to come up with
some reasonably new and fresh ideas that are an intellectual challenge
and then find a way to found or change something. That means I greatly
admire those people who have really helped shape the world in one way
or another. It takes a great deal of energy to be ambitious."
If Tang the synthesizer and mediator hopes to create islands of
hybrid sophistication and urbanity, he has picked a difficult
time. Tensions between London, Hong Kong and Beijing are increasing
rather than diminishing, and he has to keep his balancing act from
falling to one side or the other. "I believe that there is something
to be said for the clash of two cultures," he rationalizes, trying to
make something positive out of a difficult situation. "The
juxtaposition between East and West can give rise to new and very
interesting things if it is done right. You can get the best of both
worlds, something exquisite, without completely losing one's
identity." The China Club is something "interesting" that has already
been born out of Oriental-Occidental "juxtaposition" that divides
Tang's life. Through it, Tang has helped the proverbial twain to meet.
When asked if he thinks Deng Xiaoping's formula of "one country,
two systems" can work for Hong Kong in practice after July 1, Tang
pauses tentatively for a moment before replying, "The ideological
question is, 'Can you ultimately reconcile capitalism with some form
of socialism or communism?' And for me, the answer is, no, because
they are ideologically so different. Moreover, with Chinese
sovereignty there will be a great deal of constraints for Hong Kong--a
soft reign of terror that could become more and more fundamental to
our lives."
So, if Beijing cracks down, how will it be possible for Hong Kong
to continue working and flourishing?
"The only way things will work is through corruption," Tang says
matter-of-factly. "If you're not allowed to do this, and not allowed
to do that, at least through corruption you may be able to do it
secretly and carry on. Corruption gives that flexibility."
That's not a very bright assessment, and hardly a recipe for
success. Shouldn't one speak out before all this happens?
"Well, look here," he says peremptorily. "In our world there are
those who want to be martyrs and those who don't. Now, I feel that
martyrdom is an admirable thing, but not necessarily for
everyone. Anyway, it also depends on whether you decide that martyrdom
is worth it. You have to ask what protest achieves. After all, it is
the ultimate sacrifice. I think that those who don't speak out should
not be penalized as being less believers in their particular
cause. The difference is they suffer their silence whereas martyrs
suffer prison or death. Some people want to protest, I probably
don't. Perhaps I'm not as courageous, but then the purpose of my life
is not to be a martyr."
Is Tang pessimistic about the future? Not at all. "Hong Kong has
weathered storms in the past," he recently observed in another
interview. "We're clever. We've worked with one master before--the
British. We can work with another."
When asked if he is really optimistic, he says emphatically, "We
Chinese are here to stay, not to breeze in and breeze out like
foreigners. So, we haven't much choice, have we? Whenever I am asked
what would make me leave, I always reply that it would be when someone
takes away my books. But note, I didn't say newspapers, because I
think newspapers are dreadful--except, of course, for the crossword
puzzle in The Times." He laughs.
The conversation is interrupted when Chang appears with another
painting for Tang to inspect for the show. "Do you like this one?" he
asks.
"No! I hate it," Tang says with his characteristic bluntness that
mixes impatience with humor. "But I like that one." He laughs and
points at a huge black-and-white tapestry designed by Deng Xiaoping's
daughter, Deng Lin.
The opening of the show is like the first night at a gallery
anywhere else in the art world. A small gathering of people mill
around, chat and sip wine as Tang greets new guests, hands out cigars,
poses for photos and gives a brief welcoming speech in which he
comically offers a 10 percent discount to anyone willing "to buy a
painting tonight."
"It's not just his style," says Caroline Chiu. "David's got
tremendous energy and confidence in choosing art. People here have
enormous respect for what he's done by taking what is Chinese,
updating it and making it accessible."
"The most important thing about David is that he has charisma,"
Chang says. "What is also important is that he is smart and honorable,
qualities that are quite rare in Hong Kong and China where business
culture is so strong. But he can be very tough and does not allow
people to walk over him."
"He's fascinating but basically a playboy and a phony," says a
prominent Hong Kong journalist. "He may collect first-edition books
but I doubt that he reads them."
"He's a real phenomenon," says a friend who didn't want his name
used. "He's so English and yet he's Chinese. However, finally, I think
that he's more English than Chinese. He has to strain somewhat to be
Chinese, especially to bridge the abyss between Britain and China,
which has been widening rather than narrowing as [July 1,] l997
approaches."
For Tang, bridging this abyss is as much a personal struggle as a
struggle to bridge the disparity between different geopolitical
places. Several weeks after I first talked with Tang, and just before
he was due to depart for Tibet on a trip to scout out some new and
more exotic fashion ideas for his soon-to-expand chain of department
stores, we met again, this time in his office at Jardine House.
Tang's office is as strange a hybrid of design elements as his
intellect is of ideas and influences. There are photos of him with
Castro and Deng Xiaoping as well as with Governor Patten. His
cluttered inner office is filled with an eclectic collection of
European and Oriental art. Sitting in a leather chair next to a fake
fireplace as cigar smoke mixes with the pungent aroma of lilies
(courtesy of an African flower import business he also owns), Tang
opens up in a more personal way. He reveals that as a boy he was very
devoted to his grandfather, who had several wives and made a fortune
in public transportation. Tang was married to the Australian-Chinese
film actress, Susanna Cheung, but is now divorced. They have two young
children to whom Tang is very devoted. He has even translated Roald
Dahl's Charlie and the Chocolate Factory into Chinese for them. "I
simply adore children," he says. "I try to pick mine up from school
every day that I am here in Hong Kong."
Presently, Tang is about to marry an Englishwoman named Lucy
Wastnage, which raises the question of how he reconciles East and West
in his private life. When asked if he finds himself drawn more to
Occidental or Oriental women, a look of thoughtful bemusement settles
on his face.
"When I see a truly beautiful Chinese woman like Gong Li (the
star of such films as Zhang Yimou's Shanghai Triad and Chen Kaige's
Farewell My Concubine), I find that absolutely exquisite. On the
other hand, I find beautiful Western women..." He pauses, not quite
sure how to end the sentence. "Well, let's put it this way: I often
feel that I am not quite one with them...very consciously alien."
"That's a bit strange," I suggest, "because Western men don't seem
to feel quite so alien with Oriental women."
"Yes, it's interesting, isn't it?" he replies.
Does he think the difference has something to do with the Orient's
complicated historical power relationship with the West? "I suppose
so. But it probably also has something to do with the delicacy of
Oriental women. Maybe that's why there are a lot more Westerners
marrying Chinese women than Chinese men marrying Western women. My
theory is that because the Chinese woman is generally--and I
generalize here at the risk of feminists telling me that I am
completely wrong--more subservient. They know how to look after a
man. They are delicate, considerate and they don't ask so many
questions. They don't have the tradition of female emancipation as
much as what you might call Western 'career women' or today's
feminists. Men like that because it gives them less trouble. They like
the obsequiousness, tenderness and attention to care."
Does he believe in feminism? "I don't believe in feminism. I do,
however, believe in femininity. I think if you are a feminist, you
lose that femininity. I mean it is generally true that feminists are
ugly--that in a way they have some sort of a chip on their shoulder
and want to hide their femininity."
But shouldn't women have a right to equality?
"I always find it extraordinary that the feminists want
'equality.' I mean, they are much more equal than men already. In
fact, they are superior to men. If they want 'equality,' they are
stupid, because they'll just bring themselves down from a higher
level. That's why I find feminism absolutely amazing."
What are his views about Chinese men?
"On the whole, Chinese men are either megalomaniacs or complete
wimps. We're either bellicose and complete loudmouths like me, or
complete wimps. I know it's not fair to generalize, but that's how I
see it."
So what does he want in a mate?
"Well, I don't know. But I'll tell you what I think is best--to be
able to have both West and Chinese."
Does he mean a return to the old concubine system of his
grandfather's era?
"I know that all the traditions about polygamy in China ended much
later than in Western society. But, no. I mean a Eurasian woman."
If David Tang is a monumental contradiction who wants to have
everything both ways, he is also a telling emblem of the dilemma that
Chinese of his generation now confront as Hong Kong merges with China
and as China tries to merge with the world--how to combine the East
and tradition with the West and modernity. While his answers may not
always be refined, by and large they are honest. But by now he is
wealthy, powerful and famous enough not to worry how others view the
inconsistencies in his sometimes clumsy attempts to synthesize.
"Loudmouth, self-publicist, socialite, name-dropper,
show-off--perhaps I am these things," he reflects deferentially. "But,
you know, I've really gotten to the stage where I don't care what
people think of me. It doesn't matter if some people want to ostracize
me, as long as I can be with my friends, have some fun and
laugh. Laughter diffuses anger and creates optimism. If you're a
pessimist, it become self-fulfilling. I think it's a lesson that's as
true for us humans as it will be for Hong Kong." He gives a mirthful
chuckle and flicks a long ash from the end of his Cohiba into an
awaiting ashtray.
Orville Schell is a longtime observer of China and dean of the graduate school of journalism at the University of California at Berkeley.
Return to the People page
|